Large Language Models Reach Average Human Creativity

A large-scale study led by Professor Karim Jerbi and published in Scientific Reports on January 21, 2026 compared leading LLMs (including GPT-4, Claude, Gemini) with over 100,000 human participants on divergent creativity tasks. Researchers found some models now exceed average human scores on the Divergent Association Task and creative-writing tests, but the top 10% of human creators still outperform all tested models; creativity is also tunable via temperature and prompting.
Scoring Rationale
Large peer-reviewed, large-sample study showing LLM parity with average humans; limitation remains human peak superiority.
Practice with real Logistics & Shipping data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Logistics & Shipping problemsStep-by-step roadmaps from zero to job-ready — curated courses, salary data, and the exact learning order that gets you hired.
Sources
- Read OriginalResearchers tested AI against 100,000 humans on creativitysciencedaily.com
- Read OriginalAI Now Beats the Average Human in Tests of Creativitysingularityhub.com

